The Final Look
To me, the set came out wonderfully and much better than I excepted as I felt I was in a representation of my mind as well as the mind of another young adult.
Why have I chosen…
Plain paper?
I have chosen to use plain paper because whatever is written on paper from the government and the media is usually full of empty promises, threats and praises towards their young population. It is also aesthetically pleasing to the eye when the lights hit the whiteness of the paper.
As shown:
Newspaper?
This shows the media to be the only source of information about what the government is doing; they are the middle man but a corrupt middle man so the newspaper is scattered and scratched into a ball to represent their untrustworthiness.
Rope?
As said before in my other blogs, the rope represents the restraint and barriers we, as young adults, must try to break through in order to be trusted. It is just one big obstacle course with a lot of strings attached. These strings must be cut.
Union Jack Flag?
Just a reminder of where we are living and how ‘patriarchal’ we are as a country and how the government is too, supposedly.
Chair and Table?
Isn’t it better to be delivered bad news when sat around a table? Well supposedly it is, but the other reason why there is a chair and table is that they represent myself and other young adults who are trying to better themselves with education and studying hard for a £23,000 piece of paper. Additionally, they represent the constant sitting down one does when looking for a job and filling in applications or how hard it is to get a job as an inexperienced, untrusted youth of today in a recuperating UK.
The Experience of Performing
Well the piece felt like it wasn’t really quick from when I was practising it but, I felt a therapeutic release of stress as I performed it. It became an outlet which is what I wanted but, I felt that when I practised saying my opinions in a particular area of the soundscape, they had become personal and I have tainted the performance with my ideas. So, I took a risk and practised for half an hour before the performance with very open ended opinions. I think it went well and made the piece more all about the media rather than me. Finally, I was allowed to be the ‘mind’, the extra to the piece which is what I liked.
I will be truthful and say this was a first for me, to do a piece this artistic and abstract making was a big step but, discovering this side of theatre and performance was exhilarating and the freedom became a wonderful gift. To be able to create a piece for something I am very passionate about and express it and bring it to the table but not by throwing words into people’s mouths. There has been too much of that already.
I wanted that human to human connection as “we judge the limits of human endurance [and] value experience” (Birringer, 1998, 12) so this is an experience to see where we can push the limits with what is acceptable to perform and how to act as human in real life. I wanted to show “the ‘truth’ or ‘identity’ dominant culture” (Birringer, 1998, 16) as when this ‘truth’ and ‘identity’ is focused onto the audience, like in the journal article of Solo in Soho: The Performer Alone by John Howell whereby in the 70s, performance art “flourished in an atmosphere where the focus is on the audience” (Howell, 1979, 153); this is a quote from a piece where the interaction is hands on communication with the audience. My performance is communicating with the audience mentally through their imagination as a “performance earns the disdain of audiences wishing to be entertained or satisficed in terms of their analytic desires” (Birringer, 1998, 12). I wanted to keep the audience interacting with me with the openness and freedom of expression of their minds.
I feel this quote says a lot about my performance,
“if we observe how contemporary performance art,…derives their energy from direct experimental knowledge of bodily sensation or privation and how they transmit perception of sanctioned violence, discrimination and social deprivation in the body of politics through increased physical brutality on stage”
(Birringer, 1998, 15)
For me this quote shows exactly why I chose to do performance art instead of something which is autobiographical where all feelings, evidence, experiences and interpretation can be in one safe place; where nothing goes wrong and the audience have time to think on the matter and decide what side they can be on or not. It is time to reflect on what the world has given us and how to handle it through the mind of the audience.
The soundscape I felt went well as it was the first time I have ever edited audio together with the software called Audacity. Where I recorded YouTube clips such as:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7yRenBc_Zs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL51Tsh6Sdg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF0twf3u5wA
I used the style of a 1930s radio show to present the soundscape of the mixture of media to make it a bit light hearted and show how backwards and right winged the Tories are acting when it comes to a very 21st century problem. I feel that they need to get with the times and actually look up and take a big long view on what they are doing to the next generation as it is they who will step into their shoes in 5 years time or so; as “process-art are perhaps crucial at a point in history where state institutions can no longer guarantee economic and political integrations” (Birringer, 1998, 18). When I was putting the soundscape together I started to understand even more why it was important to use different media as this is what ‘millennials’ are always in contact with ie smart phones, apple watches, tablets etc. As these make it easy to access reports, hopefully, some of the audio will have been heard by the audience beforehand so they can experience it again and second question and analyse the topic better.
So this is what I felt about my performance experience of the piece.
Evaluation
What I liked?
- Finally performing it
- Having the set as dramatic and artistic than I thought it was going to be.
- Finally cutting the string after practising without it.
- Hearing great feedback as well as constructive criticism from my peers.
What to improve on?
I feel I need to use levels in the piece because there wasn’t any definition in it whatsoever. I needed to be “sensitive to the dramatic rhythm which is established” (Lecoq, 2000, 31) in every performance. I felt like I didn’t listen to the area and my body so the performance didn’t show enough depth with the contact of the space and the performer. Next time I must play with the idea of expanding out of the alcove into a bigger space or just practise with the framing and string then without it.
My opinions on the piece need to be clearer I felt, and I was disappointed within myself that I didn’t put enough courage into stating the opinions or sayings of the ‘mind’ I was stuck in as “words are approached through verbs, bearers of action, and through nouns which represent a designated object” (Lecoq, 2000, 50). So, if I was going to say it, I needed to say it with all my body and not half-heartedly.
The feedback from the audience and luckily it was my target audience, was positive; they liked it and thought it was inspirational and uplifting to see a performance about the current issues in such an abstract way. They said it felt as though they were in a mind and it was easily interpreted and open to change and that their issues came through it. Most of them felt it needed more vocal interaction from me which I agreed with and, the performance needs to expand or I must find something to do with the space used.
Overall, I felt as though this experience of working with me was very challenging but rewarding to see a performance devised entirely by myself. I may carry on with this concept and develop it in the future as I think it will me great to see it go further.
As it is all about ‘Mind over Matter’
Work cited:
Birringer, J (1998) Media and Performance: Along the border. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Bruno, S. and Dixon, L. (2015) Creating Solo Performance. London: Routledge
Howell, J (1979) Solo in Soho: The Performer Alone. Performing Arts Journal, 4 (1/2) 152-158.
Lecoq, J. (2000) The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. 3rd edition. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Media.